Skip to main content

Posts

6 steps to implement the Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)

With introduction to the foundation (5-S system) and 8 pillars on which the TPM process is built , the implementation of TPM program needs to be understood. This is generally done in 6 steps: 1) share your plans with the entire organization 2) identifying a pilot area, 3) restoring equipment to prime operating condition, 4) measuring OEE, 5) addressing and reducing major losses, and 6) implementing planned maintenance. Step 1: Share your plans with your entire organization Implementation of TPM starts with introduction of the program, creating awareness and understands the objectives and value it generates within the organisation. But above all it’s critical that management and supervisors grasp the importance of proper TPM procedures. If managers promote, introduce, and adopt a certain way of working, then shop-floor personnel will generally embrace plans much faster. Step 2: Identify a Pilot Area Identifying a work area, or a plant, or an equipment where the production process operat

The 8 pillars of Total Productive Maintenance

The Total Productive Maintenance Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is a system of maintaining and improving the integrity of production, safety and quality systems through the machines, equipment, processes, and employees morale and job satisfaction that add business value to an organization. The dual goals of TPM are zero breakdowns and zero defects; this obviously improves equipment efficiency rates and reduces costs. It also minimises inventory costs associated with spare parts.  Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) was developed by Seiichi Nakajima in Japan between 1950 and 1970. This experience led to the recognition that a leadership mindset engaging front line teams in small group improvement activity is an essential element of effective operation. The outcome of his work was the application of the TPM process in 1971. Nippon Denso (now Denso), a company that created parts for Toyota, was one of the first organizations to implement a TPM program. This resulted in an international

A comparison between SAP PM and CMMS

A comparison between SAP PM* and CMMS  *R ecently the SAP PM modules has been reviewed and reinforced with new functionalities becoming SAP EAM (SAP Enterprise Asset Management). In this article, I will use SAP PM and SAP EAM referring to same SAP module. Industries across the globe use different software and tools to manage various business processes within the organization including accounting, human resources, purchasing, production and maintenance. Some may use different standalone tools for each purpose and some may use an integrated package like an ERP to manage all purposes. One of the most popular ERP is SAP, and SAP PM is the specific module used to manage and run maintenance in an industry. In addition, on the shelf, there are available many CMMS software for the maintenance management. The choice of SAP, CMMS and other in-house software to manage maintenance activities depends on many factors. SAP PM (for those that run SAP) and various vendors of CMMS are used commonly in t

2 software solutions for maintenance activities

2 software solutions for maintenance activities In today’s world with the advancement in technology, skillsets and production demands, the industries are evolving daily with new features and tools to remain competitive. One of them is plant maintenance activity which is crucial for any business to get the maximum performance from the equipment to achieve the end results. In earlier days plant maintenance was performed manually by detailing, planning and recording in papers and files. This was a tedious process to dig into the right documents to get the equipment maintenance history, take actions and keep the equipment in operation effectively during breakdowns. Over the years with experience new tools & software’s were developed and with continuous introduction of new functionalities have resulted in various software packages like SAP PM and various CMMS . In the specific in this article, I compare 2 software solutions for the maintenance activities of machinery and production lin

Total cost of maintenance

Cost of maintenance  It's inevitable that every machine can malfunction. However, there are failures that can have very serious repercussions on production, on the machinery itself and unfortunately also injure the operators. Good maintenance can help to significantly reduce these risks and a good practice is to allocate a dedicated maintenance budget annually.  This budget should cover the costs incurred for materials, spare parts, labour and services. Therefore, if proper maintenance is planned and carried out, fewer failures will occur, a better Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) can be achieved and overheads on production costs can be reduced. Production overheads that have to take into account are both the above mentioned maintenance costs, and also the cost of production loss, which in the end is the highest price a process line pays when it is breakdown for a failure. In production lines for commodity production it is estimated that one hour of downtime can cost several thousa

How digitization can leverage the manufacturing production

5 reasons to embrace digital manufacturing Digital manufacturing is becoming an attractive concept with the development of digital technology. It is uniquely designed for the improvement in operational efficiencies, inventory control, supply chain planning, operations, compliance requirement and industrial internet of things ( IIOT ). Digital manufacturing enhances productivity, consistency, quality, connectivity, and automation intelligence. Additionally, it is efficient in lower manufacturing cost and makes companies competitive. Here we will discuss 5 reasons to transform the industrial operations with digital manufacturing. 1. Improved processes enhance the operational efficiency  Instead of traditional manual processes, it is better to utilize automated and cloud-based solutions that help in streamlining the process flow, performance, decision-making capabilities, cost rework conditions, and performance monitoring. These methods help in improving the quality of services

Overall Equipment Effectiveness, high performance gain and data analysis

Overall Equipment Effectiveness Overall Equipment Effectiveness OEE is a “best practices” metric that identifies the percentage of planned production time that is truly productive. An OEE score of 100% represents perfect production: manufacturing only good parts, as fast as possible, with no downtime. OEE is useful as both a benchmark and a baseline: - As a benchmark it can be used to compare the performance of a given production asset to industry standards, to similar in-house assets, or to results for different shifts working on the same asset;  - As a baseline it can be used to track progress over time in eliminating waste from a given production asset (leanproduction.com, 2020). OEE is a percentage metric (%) and is calculated by the simple multiplication of three factors: Availability   X   Performance   X   Quality   =   OEE Below we describe and detail every single factor that influences this important production indicator. Factors having an impact on OEE - Avail